Laserfiche WebLink
February 10, 2012 <br />Page 2 <br />TASK 4. NOP <br />No change; this task has not started. <br />TASK S. ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EIR <br />The Administrative Draft EIR is nearly complete based on the previously selected preferred alignment and design <br />alternatives. This task will update the EIR to reflect an updated, preferred alignment (f selected) and/or the <br />alternative bike crossing and alignment as new project alternatives. EIR text and figures will be updated based on <br />the final preferred alignment; preliminary engineering plans, and revised technical studies. <br />TASK 6. DRAFT EIR <br />No change; this task has not started. <br />TASK 7. ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT FINAL EIR <br />No change; this task has not started. <br />TASK 8. FINAL EIR <br />No change; this task has not started. <br />TASK 9. NOD <br />No change; this task has not started. <br />TASK 10. MANAGEMENT & COORDINATION <br />The original budget for this task was based on an anticipated 16-month project duration. The project kick-off <br />meeting was held on March 12, 2009, and work continued through April 2010 when the CEQA document was <br />placed on hold until the project could be better defined. Work then commenced in October 2011 with a 21 kick- <br />off meeting. We anticipate the engineering and CEQA process may take another 10 months depending on the <br />public outreach schedule. Therefore, we have included time for project management and coordination based on <br />an additional 6 months of work beyond the anticipated 16-month work schedule. <br />TASK 11. PROJECT MEETINGS <br />As shown in table below, a total of 5 project meetings were included in our original scope. To-date we have <br />attended 8 project meetings. To cover the fees for these additional meetings and to control the costs for this <br />amendment we have eliminated the following specific meetings previously assumed in the original scope of work: <br />Draft EIR review meeting, Final EIR review meeting, and Planning Commission Hearing preparation meeting. It is <br />our assumption that we will coordinate these efforts via email and phone calls under our project coordination <br />budget. We have also eliminated attendance at one of the two hearings anticipated for each Planning <br />Commission and City Council. If additional meetings are requested by the City additional fees may be requested. <br />TASK 12. ETAC AND RDA MEETINGS <br />Originally our attendance at two meetings was included in this task. The RDA meeting is no longer required and <br />has been eliminated. <br />TASK 13. PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING <br />One meeting; no change <br />25B-23