My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25B - AGMT - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR WARNER AVE WIDENING
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
02/04/2013
>
25B - AGMT - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR WARNER AVE WIDENING
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2013 9:42:44 AM
Creation date
1/31/2013 4:49:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25B
Date
2/4/2013
Destruction Year
2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
181 Group <br />Task C.4: Hydrology and Drainage Studies <br />Work Completed To-date Within Scope: <br />• Hydrology and drainage studies for the three Build Alternatives and supporting technical <br />documents leading to April 2010. <br />• Amendment #1, support for the development of one new alternative based on <br />discussion with city, September 14, 2011. <br />• Amendment #1, revised hydrology and drainage studies for the Preferred Build <br />Alternative. <br />• Generation of a revised Drainage Report documenting the results. The report is <br />included as part of the Preliminary Engineering Report. <br />Work Completed Out of Scope: <br />• Additional review of hydrology and drainage study based on the refinements to the Build <br />Alternative. <br />• Based on unbilled work: <br />o Staff hours: 5 <br />o Fee: $486 <br />Remaining Work to be Completed Within Scope: <br />• None if the city agrees with the recommendation to use the more conservative analysis. <br />Cost to Complete: <br />• The city identified an issue that may require a revision to the hydrology and drainage <br />studies for the Preferred Build alternative. A full reanalysis of these elements was not <br />included as part of the original scope or Amendment #1. <br />• Based on comments received to date, a full reanalysis will require the following: <br />o Assumed staff hours: 60 <br />o Assumed budget: $5,568 <br />• It is our opinion that the analysis may be conservative but applicable for the purposes of <br />environmental assessment. We do not believe the rerunning of the analysis will provide <br />value for the project. <br />Task C.6: Preliminary Engineering Plans <br />Work Completed To-date Within Scope: <br />• Preliminary engineering plans for three Build Alternatives and supporting technical <br />documents prepared by April 2010. <br />• level of detail only to define the footprint for the purpose of environmental studies. <br />Alternatives concept development did not include provisions for public involvement and <br />related refinements. <br />• Amendment #1, support for the development of one new alternative based on <br />discussion with Jason Gabriel, September 14, 2011. <br />• Amendment #1, support for refinement of preliminary engineering plans for the Preferred <br />Build Alternative from the 2010 work. <br />Work Completed Out of Scope: <br />• Preliminary engineering for two new additional Build Alternatives developed as a result <br />of city request. <br />• Technical support related to the two additional Build Alternatives. <br />• Continued support in the form of generating exhibits and support of public involvement <br />for the project that was never scoped. <br />• Based on unbilled work: <br />o Staff hours: 60 <br />25B-42
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.