My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RBF CONSULTING 3 - 2013
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
_PENDING FOLDER
>
READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
>
RBF CONSULTING 3 - 2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2018 2:52:13 PM
Creation date
4/29/2013 1:12:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
RBF CONSULTING
Contract #
A-2013-014
Agency
PUBLIC WORKS
Council Approval Date
1/22/2013
Expiration Date
12/31/2014
Insurance Exp Date
8/30/2015
Destruction Year
2021
Notes
Amended by A-2013-014-01
Document Relationships
RBF CONSULTING 3A - 2015
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
modeling program CivilStorm. The hydraulic model developed as part of this task will provide the baseline model <br />to identify system deficiencies and to test the modification alternatives of the recommended storm drain <br />improvements. The storm drain water surface profile models will only be generated for the main "collector" or <br />"trunk" storm drain lines (storm drain lines of 36" and larger, estimated to be 42 miles from current County data), <br />and the private or local facilities outside of public right-of-way intercepting the lot/building surface drainage will <br />not be analyzed. The water surface data and hydraulic information will be summarized in tabular format for each <br />reach or element of the facility to allow easy use and review. <br />Deliverables: <br />1. Hydraulic Network in CivilStorm <br />Task 3.2 Existing Municipal Storm Drain - Capacity Analysis, Hydraulic Deficiency Identification, Flooded Width <br />Calculation <br />The hydraulic models generated for the "existing" mainline storm drain systems will be analyzed in a sensitivity <br />analysis to determine the maximum hydraulic "capacity" of the system. The maximum allowable hydraulic <br />capacity will be defined as the highest elevation of the hydraulic grade line below the street that allows the surface <br />inlets to function. A sensitivity analysis will be performed by factoring the "design" discharges to a lower amount <br />until the storm drain operates without causing flooding of surface inlets. The hydraulic model will also more <br />accurately quantify with a numerical amount the amount of hydraulic conveyance that the existing system is <br />deficient. The hydraulic capacity will be converted to "level of flood protection" numerical value through a ratio of <br />the capacity flowrate to the estimated 100 -year ultimate flowrate. <br />As part of the CivilStorm modeling results, RBF will evaluate where street flooded width calculations, based on <br />gutter flow, at critical street locations. The calculations will be conducted to ensure conformance with City <br />drainage design criteria. The street flooded width analysis will be based on normal depth calculations and using <br />City of Santa Ana standard street sections. The street flooded width calculations will be used to identify locations <br />that do not meet City critical and may require additional underground storm drain improvements. <br />Deliverables (Tables summarizing): <br />1. Capacity Analysis <br />2. Flooded Width Analysis <br />Task 3.3 Deficiency Removal and Alternatives Formulation / Feasibility Analysis /CIP <br />RBF will develop preliminary alternatives formulation for removal of hydraulic deficiencies within the existing <br />"mainline" storm drain improvements. The conceptual assessment will focus on either utilizing (1) increasing the <br />hydraulic capacity through enlarged drainage facilities or new parallel system adjacent to existing facilities, (2) <br />diversion system, or (3) detention storage for flow reduction and water quality benefits. The overall watershed <br />system will be divided into study reaches for refined analysis on a reach -by -reach basis (within the predefined <br />Drainage Areas). A list of potential design options will be identified which meet the primary flood protection <br />objectives and major constraints associated with the alternatives will be discussed. A feasibility analysis will be <br />performed to screen the alternatives and develop the recommended alternative based on selection criteria, <br />including least costs and minimize public impacts. <br />Deliverables: <br />1. A technical memorandum will be prepared that summarizes the results of the alternatives analysis. The <br />memorandum will serve to reference the methodology, design assumptions, guidelines, and criteria <br />developed for the identification and evaluations of the drainage alternatives. The text of the document <br />will be prepared on MS Word. <br />Task 3.4 Drainage Improvement Facility Sizing and Alignment <br />Utilizing the results of Task 3.3, RBF will determine the proposed increased pipe sizing based upon the <br />hydrodynamic hydraulic analysis. Preliminary horizontal and vertical alignments will be developed for the <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.