My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-050 - Addendum to the Final Environment Imapct Report No. 2006-01
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2013
>
2013-050 - Addendum to the Final Environment Imapct Report No. 2006-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2013 9:30:51 AM
Creation date
11/6/2013 9:25:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2013-050
Date
10/21/2013
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hjdrology and ll %ales Qualm, <br />The Proposed Project will not have any significant hydrology or water quality iinpacts. The amount <br />and the quality of the surface water generated by the Proposed Project will be the same as the <br />approved Project. The Proposed Project is consistent xvith the analysis in the March 19, 2007 EIR. <br />I-and Use and Planning <br />The Proposed Project proposes 120 less residential units than the approved Project. As a result, <br />there will be less density and the building heights will be less than the approved Project. The <br />Proposed Project, like the approved Project, meets all applicable design and development standards <br />for development in the Active Urban District the project. The Proposed Project is consistent with <br />the analysis in the March 17, 2007 EIR and there will be no land use impacts. <br />MineralResoinres <br />The Proposed Project will not have any mineral impacts. Based on the approved Project EIR there <br />are no mineral resources on or adjacent to the project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project is <br />consistent with the analysis and mitigation measures in the 1 -larch 19, 2007 EIR. <br />Noise <br />The Proposed Project will not result in any new or significant noise impacts compared to the <br />approved Project. The project proposes 120 fewer residential units than the approved Project and <br />as a result the time of construction will be less. Because the Proposed Project will have less <br />development there will less traffic and less traffic noise. The Proposed Project will have a positive <br />noise impact compared to the approved Project because there will be less noise generated during <br />project construction and the life of the project. <br />Populalion and Holt ring <br />The Proposed Project will have 120 foxver residential units than the approved Project. As a result, <br />the project will generate fewer people than the approved Project. Like the Project, the Proposed <br />Project will not eliminate any evsting housing and require the construction of replacement housing. <br />Vfith fewer project residents the Proposed Project will have a less growth inducement. The <br />Proposed Project will not have any population or housing impacts. <br />Public Senores <br />The Proposed Project will have it positive impact to public services compared to the Project because <br />the Proposed Project will have 120 fewer residential units. With fewer residents the demand for <br />public services will be less with a positive impact on the public services that serve the project. The <br />Proposed Project will have a positive impact to public services compared to the Project. <br />1901 Fast First Street— Addendum Page 8 <br />August 14, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.