2013-050 - Addendum to the Final Environment Imapct Report No. 2006-01

Home Browse Search

Remotion Like the approved Project the residents of the Proposed Project Nvill most likely use the recreational facilities that will be provided by the project. The Proposed Project residents, like the residents of the approved Project, are not anticipated to use existing city recreational facilities and significantly impact existing city recreational facilities. The Proposed Project will be required to pay parkland fees that will be used to provide additional park and recreational facilities in Santa Ana. The Proposed Project is consistent with the analysis in the March 19, 2007 EIR and mill not have any recreational impacts. Twlnportntion/Trnfc The Proposed Project will generate approximately 894 fewer daily trips, including 67 fewer AM peak hour trips and 77 fewer PM peak hour trips than the approved Project. The proposed 2,424 square feet of retail space will mainly serve the project residents and is not anticipated to generate additional trips. The Proposed Project would have a positive traffic impact because there will be a net traffic trip reduction compared to the approved Project. Utilities and Serino Systems The Proposed Project will have a positive impact to the utilities and service systems that serve the project because there will be 120 fewer residential units. As a result, there will be less consumption of water and less generation of wastewater and solid waste. The Proposed Project will have a positive impact on utilities and service systems compared to the approved Project. V. Summary of Findings Based on the environmental analysis, the Proposed Project will not result in any new or significant impacts that were not previously analyzed and adequately addressed in the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone and First and Cabrillo Towers EIR and adopted March 19, 2007, The Proposed Project will provide 120 less residential units and 6,476 square feet of retail space less than the approved Project. As demonstrated by this Addendum: • The Proposed Project does not constitute substantial changes that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously significant effects; • The Proposed Project does not constitute substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previous identified significant effects; and • The Proposed Project does not constitute new information of substantial importance that show that the Proposed Project will have one of more significant effects not discussed in the 1901 East First Street — Addendum Page 9 August 14, 2013