Laserfiche WebLink
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT N0, C•3 -2084 <br />ATTACHMENT A <br />KRAEMER BOULEVARD / GLASSELL STREET I GRAND AVENUE — TSSP <br />recording of bicycle and pedestrian activity for specific data collection in support of <br />upcoming changes to the CA MUTCD. Video recording and data reduction shall be <br />required at a minimum of G locations. PROJECT Traffic Forum will approve the <br />locations. <br />b. CONSULTANT and designated sub consulting Traffic Counting Firm shall be cognizant <br />_..... _. of. the .. fact. that . queuing of.. rig ht. turn .vehicles. or left - turn . vehicles that do not pass .the... <br />limit line for counting purposes during the count time period shall also be counted as <br />part of the quarter hour period in which they occur. (This means that if a queue <br />develops that is not served in one cycle and the counting period is ending, the number <br />of un served cars In the queue shall be included in that 15 minute period. it shall not be <br />included in the succeeding 15 minute period). <br />c, TMCs that are s 2 years of age, and supplied by an alternate viable source, for an <br />intersection, may be used in lieu of a manual count. Per the CTFP Guidelines and the <br />precepts of the Measure M2 Ordinance, TMC's supplied by a PARTY cannot be used <br />as a credit against match funding requirements. <br />5. All counts shall be summarized in MS Excel 2010 format. Copies of the raw data count <br />sheets will be provided to each involved AGENCY and APM, (See CTFP Guidelines, page <br />8 —14, for ROADS requirements) <br />Deliverables — Task 2: <br />1. Report summarizing data collection effort, including intersection turning counts, traffic collision <br />analysis, current traffic signal timing patterns, and drawings of intersection features. <br />2. Electronic versions of all data files (See CTFP Guidelines, page 8 — 14, for ROADS <br />requirements) <br />3. Raw video footage of intersections receiving Video Counting to OCTA only. <br />4. Deliverables of Task 1 and Task 2 to AGENCIES shall be limited to political boundaries. <br />Task 3: Field Review, Plans Specifications and Estimates, Design Standards and <br />Requirements <br />CONSULTANT shall review the geometric layout, existing traffic signal equipment and signal <br />synchronization related infrastructure, and identify any deficiencies for each Intersection and <br />along the whole corridor. The review shall include an assessment of the existing intersection <br />geometry, traffic conditions, and traffic signal control equipment and telemetryAnterconnect <br />facilities along the corridor and of each intersection using observation, available as -built plans, <br />consultation with the local AGENCIES, and AGENCY supplied aerial photos. CONSULTANT" <br />will use a standard field form developed by CONSULTANT for this review that accounts for <br />each piece of intersection data required. With permission of the local AGENCIES, <br />CONSULTANT will inspect the interior of each traffic control cabinet, inspect the telemetry <br />systems and determine their respective condition and make recommendations for equipment <br />upgrades. CONSULTANT is advised that certain infrastructure and equipment upgrades have <br />been identified previously by the AGENCIES and reviewed by the APM and shall be a <br />requirement of this project, These items are identified subsequently within this document. <br />2. CONSULTANT shall also include an identification of all planned and programmed Improvements <br />(widening projects, intersection improvements, etc.) on the study corridor. The identification of <br />these projects should be at minimum a list summarizing all improvements, <br />P2VE' 23 <br />