Laserfiche WebLink
a Level of integration between applications and demonstrated Interfaces with external <br />systems /devices. <br />• Capability, design, reliability, warranty and expandability of proposed hardware <br />e Economic feasibility and Justification of all costs. <br />a Vendor willingness and ability to negotiate a contract acceptable to the City. <br />Feasibility, timeliness and quality of software Implementation schedule and conversion <br />Plans (if data conversion Is required). <br />• Level of assistance to be provided to the City by the vendor during the implementation <br />process as part of the contract. <br />• The number of hours and extent of user training. <br />0 Quality and extent of the documentation to be provided. <br />Additionally, information pertaining to each major area of the specifications would be summarized, <br />evaluated and ranked. The sample illustration, below, Is one of approximately 100 such charts <br />produced by our proprietary RFP scoring tool, Cit Cam provides all clients with these illustrations <br />to provide graphic displays of vendor responses in each proposed module; enabling a visible <br />presentation of vendor contrasts: <br />Information pertaining to each major area of the specifications would be summarized, evaluated and <br />ranked. Additional information and clarification would be obtained from responding vendors as <br />required. Finally, the list of vendors would be narrowed to two seml- fmalist vendors who would be <br />further evaluated though vendor demonstrations, operational site visits, reference checks and oral <br />interviews. Based upon the proposal and subsequent analysis, Cit Cam would recommend the <br />company whose system(s) and equipment best meet the overall requirements of the City in a Finalist <br />Recommendation Report, The Finalist Recommendation Report would be submitted both in <br />N <br />� <br />t°t <br />