Laserfiche WebLink
Project Understanding / Scope of Work <br />1. Walking (Recommended) based MlcrOPAVER survey (performed on Tablets live in the <br />field); this survey methodology is required by OCTA. Our staff will establish all <br />inspection sample locations for survey based on MicroPAVER / OCTA December 2012 <br />guidelines. <br />2. Automated Digital Roadway Imaging (Optional Task 4.1) survey; Bucknam has recently <br />performed this service for the cities of Fountain Valley, Cypress, RSM, Santa Ana, La <br />Habra Heights, Tustin, National City and Palm Desert for PIMP and ROW inspections. <br />MicroPAVER sampling method used. <br />Distress types will be collected based upon actual surface conditions and physical characteristics <br />of the segment. Surveying methods will be conducted by remaining consistent with MicroPAVER <br />& the Army Corp of Engineers sampling guidelines while being flexible to current City practices. <br />We will use the City's GIS centerline live in the field to reduce survey times and project <br />schedules. If the City has a recent high - resolution aerial (approx. 3 ") we will use this file during <br />our field survey efforts to verify street measurements and other segment attributes. <br />Our use of MicroPAVER- Tablet units allows our staff to collect pavement data with the City of <br />Santa Ana's MicroPAVER database live in the field. At the end of the day all electronic data is <br />transferred to our office for quality control and management. Our Tablet methodology sets us <br />apart from the competition since we are using a paper -less inventory process to enter data; <br />this in turn generates cost savings to enhance other portions of the project such as CIP <br />reporting, MicroPAVER training, and on -call services. <br />Roadway Verification Survey - A listing of the field attribute data that is updated /verified during <br />the survey for the pavement management database is listed below. Bucknam will obtain <br />measurements of each streets width, length and surface classification and compare it to existing <br />PAVER data. Discrepancies in the data will be tabulated and reviewed by Bucknam and the City <br />prior to any update within PAVER. <br />1. Field Attribute Data (updated and /or verified) <br />• From /to, indicating the assigned limits of the section, sample test areas, street <br />name, a street codification (arranged west to east and south to north) <br />• Street ranking indicating local, alley, arterial, collector, # of lanes, surface type <br />• Historical PCI tracking from previous inspections and 2014 PCI inspections <br />• Segment quantities, indicating the length, width, and total true area of the section <br />• Pavement distresses compliant with MicroPAVER — OCTA guidelines (i.e. alligator <br />cracking, block cracking, rutting, long/trans cracking, weathering, etc. <br />2. Conditional data will be evaluated for all street segments and will include: <br />• MicroPAVER 20 AC & 19 PCC distresses by type, severity and sample area <br />• PCI ratings (0 -100); persegment, per grid zone, per maintenance zone and citywide <br />• Other known orfound environmental issues (standing water, site condition, etc.) <br />3 -4 <br />