Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana -Park View at Town and Country Manor <br />Draft EIR <br />Table 4.6.23 (cont.): Summary of Peak Hour Intersection Operation <br />General Plan Buildout Without Project <br />Int. # I ft Caltrans Controlled Signalized IntersectionS2 <br />10 Main StreeU1-5 SB Off -Ramp /Santa Clam Avenue/1 -5 NB On- <br />Ramp <br />AM Peak <br />Hour <br />and Traffic <br />PM Peak <br />Hour <br />Delay LOS Delay <br />LOS <br />34.0 C 53.1 D <br />Notes: <br />ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization WB = Westbound EB = Eastbound <br />NB = Northbound SB = Southbound HOV = High Occupancy Vehicle <br />' Signalized intersections in the Cites of Santa Ana and Orange are evaluated using the Intersection Capacity <br />Utilization methodology. <br />Signalized intersections under Caltrans control are evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual methodology. <br />3 hitersections within a Major Development Area in the City of Santa Ana have a LOS E criteria. <br />Source: Traffic Impact Study and Parking Analysis for the Park View at Town & Country Manor, Kimley -Horn <br />Associates, hie., June 2009. <br />General Plan (2030) Buildout Traffic Conditions With the Project <br />Project traffic was added to the General Plan (2030) Buildout traffic volumes, and the study <br />intersections and roadway segments were re- analyzed. Roadway segment operation under General <br />Plan Buildout conditions with project traffic was evaluated and the results are summarized in Table <br />4.6 -24. Parker Street between La Veta Avenue and Town & Country Road is forecasted to continue <br />to operate at LOS F. (This roadway segment is forecasted to operate at LOS F without and with the <br />proposed project in 2030.) The proposed project will not have a significant impact on this roadway <br />segment because the V/C ratio increase caused by the project will be less than 0.01. However, the <br />City of Santa Ana requires intersection and roadway improvements to be identified for locations <br />which are forecasted to operate below acceptable standards even without the project, regardless of <br />whether the project creates a significant impact. Per the City's traffic impact analysis guidelines, <br />improvements are specified in project mitigation. <br />Table 4.6 -24: Summary of Daily Roadway Operation General Plan Buildout (2030) With Project <br />Michael Brandman Associates 4.6 -29 <br />H\Cl t(PN- JMb32]b32]003MMVB2]0030 Sec0 Trayspo .d¢ <br />Type of <br />Lane <br />Change <br />IN <br />Roadway Segm <br />Arterial <br />ConN. <br />V/C <br />in VIC <br />ILa Veta Avenue <br />Major <br />6 -lane <br />56,300 <br />26,800 <br />0.476 <br />0.002 <br />A <br />Main S treet and the SR -22 <br />divided <br />WB ramps <br />Veta Avenue <br />Major <br />6 -lane <br />56,300 <br />28,000 <br />0.497 <br />0.002 <br />A <br />- SR-22 WB ramps and <br />divided <br />Glassell Street <br />Town & Country Road <br />Primary <br />4 -lane <br />37,500 <br />21,100 <br />0.563 <br />0.005 <br />A <br />- Main Street and the SR -22 <br />divided <br />EB ramps <br />Michael Brandman Associates 4.6 -29 <br />H\Cl t(PN- JMb32]b32]003MMVB2]0030 Sec0 Trayspo .d¢ <br />