Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana, CA <br />principal and interest expense on bonded debt, and capital improvement requirements are considered. <br />Annual projections of customers, water use, revenues, and expenditures have been made using <br />historical data for the next five years. <br />SCOPE OF WORK <br />Black & Veatch was retained by the City to develop a multi -year financial plan, conduct a cost of service <br />analysis and design rates for both of its enterprises. The results of a study of the projected revenues, <br />revenue requirements, costs of service, and rates for water service are presented herein. For purposes <br />of this report, the study period is the five fiscal years beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2019. <br />Based on Proposition 218, agencies may not set rates in excess of 5 -year increments. Unless otherwise <br />noted, references in this report to a specific year are for the City's year ending June 30. To avoid <br />confusion between calendar and fiscal years, the term FY refers to the year beginning July 1 and ending <br />June 30. Black & Veatch has projected revenues and revenue requirements for the study period based <br />on a review of historical factors and the each enterprise's operating and capital budgets and financial <br />policies. The study of revenue requirements recognizes projected operation and maintenance (0 &M) <br />expense, establishment and /or maintenance of reserve funds, and capital financing requirements. <br />Capital financing requirements include payments on outstanding bond issues as well as capital <br />improvement expenditures met from annual revenues and available reserve funds. <br />The Water Enterprise's cost of service used the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Manual <br />M1. This allocation methodology produces cost of service allocations recognizing the projected <br />customer service requirements for the City. Proposed rates are designed in accordance with allocated <br />cost of service and local policy considerations. The extent to which the existing rate structure recovers <br />revenues from customer classes in accordance with cost of service allocations is also evaluated. <br />OVERVIEW OF LEGAL AND INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICES FOR COST -OF- SERVICE <br />STUDIES <br />Rate - setting procedures in California require that agencies responsible for imposing property- related <br />charges must demonstrate a nexus between the cost of providing services and the services or benefits <br />received. The state of California considers water and wastewater services as property - related fees and <br />as such, subject to state constitutional and statutory requirements. Presented in the next few sections <br />are brief summaries of the relevant laws governing the Study. <br />Proposition 13 <br />Government Code Section §50076, adopted in 1979 provides that "special taxes shall not include any fee <br />which does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service or regulatory activity for which the <br />fee is charged." <br />Proposition 218 <br />California voters approved Proposition 218 in November 1996. This voter - approved initiative added <br />Articles XIIIC and D to the California Constitution. Article MID Section 2(e), is a definition of a "fee ". <br />Essentially, as defined by Proposition 218, a fee is "any levy other than an ad valorem tax, a special tax, <br />or an assessment, imposed by an agency upon a parcel or upon a person as an incident of property <br />ownership, including a userfee or charge for a property related service ". Until 2006, sewer charges were <br />BLACK & VEATCH I Introduction 15 <br />65B -27 <br />