25F - AGMT - DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT

Home Browse Search

URS will provide the City with review comment disposition forms, redlines, redline back - checks, and QMS forms upon request. 1.4 Stakeholder Liaison — URS will obtain the services of a Stakeholder Liaison to be selected by the City of Santa to provide project review and project recommendations during the course of project development and implementation. Dedverables: • Project Meeting Agendas, supporting meeting information, and appropriate presentation materials including easement exhibits describing the required properties for the implementation of the project. All initial deliverables shall be forwarded to the City for review and approval prior to distribution to the meeting invitees. Upon approval, the City of Santa Ana will prepare all required legal descriptions and plats required to describe and negotiate the procurement of required easements. • At the request of the City, URS will provide the City with review check information based on our internal "Detailed Reviews" including redline review, issue resolution documentation, and external review documentation. Task 2 -- Final Basis of Design URS has identified and presented a number of alternatives as part of our previous efforts in the development of this project. In addition to those presented in previous documents and as discussed in the Proposed Project Description Section, URS will further refine Design Iteration No. 3 that will include the development of an in- channel trash screening structure. URS has also anticipating up to two additional design refinements dependent on comments from the County of Orange and other stakeholders. It is further anticipated that a direct in- channel solution will need to be refined to satisfy County Flood Control regarding flow conveyance restrictions that may incorporate a rubber dam solution and off channel trash screening system. All design refinements will be used to identify the preferred alternative and ultimately form the basis for the final design. URS will prepare a Basis of Design Memorandum (BOD) with a decision matrix that outlines the pros, cons and estimated construction costs for each refined alternative for the City's and Stakeholders review and final alternative selection. The specific tasks and items to be included and addressed in the BOD are as follows: 2.1 Existing Data Collection, Utility Research & Review — URS will perform an existing utility search for underground utilities witivn the project area, specifically along the proposed force main pipeline. The utility search will be completed using Underground Services Alert (USA) and as -built searches through the Cities of Costa Mesa and Newport Beach; Caltrans and the County of Orange. All affected utilities including water, sewer, gas, electric and telephone will be field marked and reviewed by the design team. Utility notifications will be prepared and sent to utility providers within the project area to obtain as- builts, atlas mapping and existing easement documentation. 2.2 Coordination with Caltrans District 12 — URS will obtain as -built plans for the Irvine Avenue /Campus Drive existing bridge over the SR -73 for the development of the proposed 8" force main crossing. Coordination efforts with Caltrans will include the development of the proposed crossing plans, and obtain required permits to allow for construction. 2.3 Permits and Easements — URS will identify and prepare a review of all permits and easements that will be necessary for construction. Permits from the following agencies are anticipated: • Orange County Flood Control District — Encroachment Permit; • City of Newport Beach /City of Costa Mesa — Encroachment Permit; • California Department of Fish and Game —1602 Agreement; • USACE — 404 Nationwide Perm t; 25P245