Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street Widening Project WarnerAve to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) <br />preservation policy or ordinance? <br />The proposed project may involve the removal of existing landscaping, including trees. Any removal or <br />planting of trees is required to comply with the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code, Article VII, Regulation of <br />the Planting, Maintenance, and Removal of Trees. Furthermore, the proposed project would not conflict with <br />the City's tree ordinance. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than <br />previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />(f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community <br />Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? <br />The proposed project site is not a part of any habitat conservation plan. The project site is developed with <br />urban uses and no natural conservation plans are adopted for the area. Implementation of the proposed project <br />would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />3.5 Cultural Resources <br />This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsection <br />T, Cultural Resources, of the previously approved 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />(a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as de£med in § <br />15064.5? <br />The proposed project would not involve changes that were not addressed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Based on <br />aerial photographs and a windshield survey, the structures do not appear to be of historical significance due to <br />unique architecture and are not anticipated to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a <br />historical resource. Land uses within the Phase IV project area affected parcels include single family <br />residential, parking lots, strip malls, shopping plazas, and various office uses. Implementation of the proposed <br />project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />(b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to <br />§ 15064.5? <br />Due to the limited area of disturbance, within an existing developed and urban area, and limited depth of <br />proposed excavations, the potential to uncover archaeological resources is considered low. However, <br />implementation of mitigation measures as included in the previously approved 1990 Final EIS /EIR would <br />reduce impacts to archaeological resources yet uncovered or undiscovered. The proposed project would not <br />result in archaeological impacts greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />(c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic <br />feature? <br />ANA 305 -'194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 33 <br />