20A - AA - AGMT - SAFE MOBILITY - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Santa Ana Safe Mobility Plan Enforcement, Education and Outreach Expanded Scope City of Santa Ana Trask 2.6 Enforcement Recommendation; Based on the work in Task 2, above (New Task 4.5), we will develop specific enforcement recommendations related to 1) process /system improvements; 2) directed patrols; and 3) diversion programs, The recommendations will assume three levels of investment for each improvement category, and estimate the needed additional staffing resources, budget and relative collision reduction outcomes. We will review the recommendations, and confirm estimated costs with a focus group of enforcement personnel and revise in accordance with their concerns. Deliverables: • Summary of opportunities and constraints to changing current practices related to enforcement, data collection and data storage. • Enforcement recommendations related to 1) process /system improvements; 2) directed patrols; and 3) diversion programs This scope of work will develop a recommendation for a school curriculum that can be taught by school or city personnel. This curriculum will build on the current efforts and support the development of confident cyclists, better future adult drivers, and a culture of tolerance for alternative transportation. The Stakeholder interviews in Task 1.4 will identify which curricula the traffic safety program should comply with. If they use the SPARK physical education curriculum, which is flexible to add bike safety education material, we will work to comply with that. The curriculum must be approachable to a wide variety of teachers so that it will be taught regardless of staffing changes. An optional scope of work could be undertaken to develop Santa Ana specific Lesson Plan materials for incorporation in an existing prototypical traffic safety program. We recommend that the materials be developed the fall of 2015, with test teaching taking place late in 2015 -16, and that the materials can be revised for adoption by the district in the 16 -17 school year. We have budgeted time as optional tasks for the development, and revision, assuming our work would otherwise be dark on this project between February and June. Optional Task 3.1 Curriculum Review Subsequent to developing a shared understanding with the stakeholders of the target audiences, the potential instructors, and the important messages, we will review sample programs for their flexibility in meeting those goals and recommend a program best suited to Santa Ana. We will also review sample education programs for their ability to meet California Physical Education Standards and for their performance against criteria NelsonWygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. 15 20A -8