My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - CUP - 1002 E 17TH ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2016
>
06/07/2016
>
31A - CUP - 1002 E 17TH ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2016 4:35:08 PM
Creation date
6/2/2016 3:04:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
31A
Date
6/7/2016
Destruction Year
2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CUP No. 2016 -13 <br />Variance No. 2016 -03 <br />May 9, 2016 <br />Page 7 <br />The congestion generated by patrons parking in the surrounding community poses safety hazards <br />to motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians using those streets. Congestion creates an unsafe <br />environment for cyclists and pedestrians who are negatively impacted by excessive vehicular traffic <br />and street parking on residential streets that are not designed to accommodate high - impact land <br />uses such as banquet facilities. Moreover, patrons returning to vehicles after banquet events during <br />late hours generate noise that degrades the quality of life for residents in the area. Finally, the <br />Impacted on- street parking negatively impacts the abilities of emergency responders to quickly and <br />safely service the area. Emergency vehicles will not be able to locate sufficient parking areas to <br />respond to incidents in the residential community adjacent to the project site. <br />General Plan Impacts <br />As a result of the project site's location and the insufficient parking provided on the site, the <br />proposed use will adversely affect the General Plan. Land Use Element Policy 2.5 supports <br />balancing economic and fiscal benefits of commercial development with impacts on the quality of <br />life in the City. The proposed use will negatively impact the surrounding community by creating <br />detrimental parking impacts and congestion. Because no additional parking options are available <br />on site, the project does not support Policy 2.10, which supports new development that is <br />harmonious in scale and character with existing development in the area. In addition, the <br />proposed applications do not support numerous policies in Goal 5 of the Land Use Element, to <br />ensure that the impacts of development are mitigated. These include Policy 5.2, to protect the <br />community from incompatible land uses; Policy 5.5, to encourage development that is compatible <br />with surrounding land uses; and Policy 5.7, to anticipate that the intensity of new development <br />does not exceed available infrastructure capacity. <br />Public Notification <br />Staff has been in communication with residents of the surrounding residential community and <br />other tenants at the center since the project was first submitted to the City for review in August <br />2015. These individuals have expressed concern about the current operations of the banquet <br />facility and the potential for the project to seek the required land use entitlements and permits to <br />operate. These individuals also provided details about the negative impacts generated by the <br />high - impact land use; these details are included in the preceding Project Analysis section. <br />The project is not located within the boundaries of an established Neighborhood Association. <br />However, staff contacted the presidents of the nearby Fairhaven, Park Santiago, and Grand <br />Sunrise neighborhood associations to ensure that they were notified of this project and to identify <br />any areas of concern with the project. The presidents did not identify any areas of concern with <br />staff's negative recommendation. One of the individuals contacted by staff expressed his support <br />for staff's negative recommendation, citing the deleterious impacts of the banquet facility's <br />operations to neighbors in the vicinity. <br />31A-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.