My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25C - AGMT - OCWD CENTENNIAL PARK
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2016
>
06/21/2016
>
25C - AGMT - OCWD CENTENNIAL PARK
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2016 9:59:52 AM
Creation date
6/16/2016 3:53:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Parks, Recreation, & Community Services
Item #
25C
Date
6/21/2016
Destruction Year
2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 5 <br />adequate amounts Of Suitable habitat to support special status plant or special <br />status wildlife species. Therefore, the implementation of the Proposed Project <br />would not result in any adverse short-term construction related impacts or <br />adverse long term operational impacts to any special status plant or special <br />status wildlife species, <br />Centennial Lake is a man-made lake that does not contain suitable habitat to <br />Support native fish. Centennial lake has historically been planted with non-native <br />fish. The water that would be backwashed from the injection wells would be <br />drinking water quality water and would be a relatively small amount compared to <br />overall amount of water in the lake. The periodic back flushing of the well water <br />would improve circulation at the lake help which would help to increase dissolved <br />oxygen levels and improve water quality for aquatic life. <br />Alternative 3: Reduced Intensity Alternative <br />As shown on Table 1' 7 and Table 18 there would be low potential for special <br />status plant and special status wildlife species to occur at Centennial Park or at <br />the Heritage Museum. The implementation of Alternative 3 Would not result in <br />any adverse impacts to any special status plant or special status wildlife species. <br />Alternative 4: Pipeline Design Alternative <br />As shown on Table 17 and Table 18 there would be low potential for special <br />status plant and special status wildlife species to occur at Centennial Park or at <br />the Heritage Museum, The implementation of Alternative 4 would not result in <br />any adverse impacts to any special status plant or special status wildlife species. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No mitigation measures required. <br />Level of Impact after Mitigation <br />Alternative 1: No adverse impact <br />Alternative 2: No adverse impact <br />Alternative 3: No adverse impact <br />Alternative 4: No adverse impact <br />IMPACT B10.2: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any <br />riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in Il <br />regional plans, policies and regulations or by the California Department of <br />Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? <br />Mid Basin Centennial Park � lednfgeroject Final EIR 5-55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.