Laserfiche WebLink
Section 5 <br />project area. Additionally, the Proposed Project would not involve the <br />construction of new infrastructure or expansion of existing infrastructure to <br />facilitate new housing and population growth within the project area. The <br />increased amount of ground water recharge capacity from the Proposed Project <br />would help to meet existing and planned water demands within in the project <br />area, <br />The construction of the Proposed Project would generate short-term employment <br />opportunities within the project area. The employment opportunities would most <br />likely be filled from County-wide employment pool and would not generate a <br />need for additional housing or increase population levels within the project area. <br />Alternative 3: Reduced Intensity Alternative <br />Under Alternative 3, one less injection well would be constructed. Similar to the <br />Proposed Project, OCWD could hire additional workers to operate and maintain <br />the injections wells. Because one less injection well would be operated and <br />maintained a reduced amount of new workers could potentially be needed. The <br />additional workers would be minimal and would not substantially change existing <br />housing and population levels within the project area, <br />The Proposed Project would generate short employment opportunities. Because <br />one less injection well would be constructed there could potentially be fewer <br />employment opportunities. Similar to the Proposed Project, the short-term <br />employment opportunities would not substantially change existing housing and <br />population levels within the project area. <br />Alternative 4: Pipeline Design Alternative <br />Under Alternative 4, the long-term employment opportunities and short-term <br />employment opportunities would be similar to the Proposed Project, No <br />substantial change to existing levels of employment, housing and population <br />would occur within the project area. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No mitigation measures required. <br />Level of Impact <br />Alternative 1: No adverse impact <br />Alternative 2: No adverse impact <br />Alternative 3: No adverse impact <br />Alternative 4: No adverse impact <br />IMPACT EJ-2: Would the project cause disproportionately high and adverse <br />impacts on minorities and low income households? <br />C, J Mid Basin Centennial Park2fiGrUlProject Final FIR 5-80 <br />�'Zo <br />