My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25E - AGMT - STREETCAR DESIGN SRVS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
04/04/2017
>
25E - AGMT - STREETCAR DESIGN SRVS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 6:06:18 PM
Creation date
3/30/2017 5:32:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25E
Date
4/4/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C -5 -3583 <br />EXHIBIT B <br />City receives the complete package of Plans and Specifications for each submittal. OCTA and the <br />CITY shall endeavor to shorten review durations where possible. <br />The AUTHORITY shall hold comment resolution meetings for each formal review stage and <br />discipline, and shall discuss rejected comments with each reviewer. It is the AUTHORITY's <br />responsibility to evaluate conflicting review comments between the various stakeholders (utility <br />companies, agencies, etc.) and work with the reviewers to develop a final disposition. <br />The AUTHORITY shall respond in writing to each comment received within thirty (30) days. <br />Any comments received after the review period shall be evaluated for relevance and shall be <br />incorporated into the next design submittal when applicable. Comments received after the Ready to <br />Bid review period, that have a material effect on Project cost or schedule shall be considered a <br />Betterment. The exclusion of any review comment from the CITY shall be discussed between the <br />Parties until mutually agreed upon. Any review comment not resolved within a reasonable time may <br />be requested by either Party to be resolved in the Dispute Resolution process, identified in Article <br />10.L. <br />The AUTHORITY shall adopt a validation process to ensure that all accepted comments (from <br />all reviewers) have been incorporated into the Plans and Specifications. The AUTHORITY shall <br />demonstrate to the CITY that all comments have been implemented or resolved satisfactorily in the <br />final Plans and Specifications. <br />Comments received that are deemed a Betterment, as determined by the AUTHORITY, shall <br />be discussed with the CITY to determine if the CITY is interested in submitting a Betterment request. <br />6.1.6 Authorization to Bid <br />The AUTHORITY may advertise the procurement of a Construction Contractor as necessary <br />to meet the Project schedule. The AUTHORITY shall not issue the Invitation for Bids for construction <br />until the Ready to Bid set of documents is complete as defined in Article 1 of the Agreement unless <br />provided for otherwise herein. <br />Exhibit B <br />Page 15 <br />L:%Camm\ CLERICAL\ WORDPROCVAGREE\AG53583�prrarka� 2�614.27.dom <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.