My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25K - AGMT - SECURITY SRVS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
05/16/2017
>
25K - AGMT - SECURITY SRVS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2017 3:58:15 PM
Creation date
5/11/2017 3:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25K
Date
5/16/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. EXHIBIT D —RELEVANT WORK HISTORY <br />E. EXHIBIT E— PROPOSER'S STATEMENT <br />F. EXHIBIT F — CERTIFICATION OF NONDISCRIMINATION BY <br />CONTRACTOR <br />G. EXHIBIT G—RESPONSIBLE PROPOSER— SUPPLEMENTAL <br />QUESTIONNAIRE <br />H. EXHIBIT H —NONCOLLUSION AFFIDAVIT <br />EXHIBIT I — SAMPLE ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT FOR <br />COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY <br />The proposal must be completely responsive to the RFP. Any exceptions to <br />the requirements of this RFP must be included in the proposal. Such <br />exceptions must be included as a separate element of the proposal entitled <br />"Exceptions and Deviations." The Executive Director, in his sole and absolute <br />discretion, may authorize or deny any exceptions. <br />K. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted and no <br />representation is made hereby that any contract will be awarded pursuant to <br />this RFP or otherwise. The City reserves the right to waive minor <br />inconsistencies in submitted Proposals. <br />XXIII. CONTRACTOR SELECTION — PROPOSAL AND EVALUATION <br />As a result of this RFP, the City intends to award a contract to the responsible <br />Proposer(s) whose response conforms to the RFP and whose RFP presents the <br />greatest value to the City, all evaluation criteria considered. The combined weight of <br />the evaluation criteria is greater in importance than cost in determining the greatest <br />value to the City. The goal is to award a contract to the Proposer(s) that proposes the <br />City the best quality as determined by the combined weight of the evaluation criteria. <br />The City may award a contract of higher qualitative competence over the lowest <br />priced response. In addition, the City may choose to award a contract to more than <br />one proposer. <br />The basic information that each section should contain is specified below, these <br />specifications should be considered as minimum requirements. Much of the material <br />needed to present a comprehensive proposal can be placed into one of the sections <br />listed. However, other criteria may be added to further support the evaluation process <br />whenever such additional criteria are deemed appropriate in considering the nature of <br />the good and /or services being solicited. <br />City of Santa Ana Unarmed Security Guard S—I kFPOI pa a 13 <br />25rx 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.