My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH BRISTOL ST MEMORY LN PROJECT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
12/05/2017
>
75A - PH BRISTOL ST MEMORY LN PROJECT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2017 5:34:02 PM
Creation date
11/30/2017 7:30:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
75A
Date
12/5/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-6883 <br />Would the project: <br />a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for exanhple, by proposing new <br />homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other <br />infrastructure)? <br />The proposed Project involves the partial acquisition of three parcels in order to widen Bristol Street, located within <br />a highly urbanized and built -out area. The proposed Project is designed to accommodate the existing and future <br />traffic volume and would not create new trips. The proposed Project would not result in additional impacts. <br />Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable. <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. <br />b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement <br />housing elsewhere? <br />A total of three properties would be partially acquired as a result of the proposed widening of Bristol Street. All <br />proposed areas of acquisition include vacant portions of commercial and multi -family residential properties. These <br />vacant areas consist of paving/asphalt or ornamental landscaping. The acquisitions would comply with policies <br />pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as implemented <br />by the City of Santa Ana. No removal of housing would occur. Impacts would not be greater than that previously <br />analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable. <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. <br />C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing <br />elsewhere? <br />Refer to Response 3.13(b). Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable. <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. <br />3.14 PUBLIC SERVICES <br />This section corresponds with the 1990 FEIS/EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation <br />Measures, Subsection P, Impacts on Community Facilities, and Subsection V, Constnmction Impacts. <br />a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new <br />or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental <br />facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to <br />maintain acceptable serve ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the <br />public services: <br />V Fire Protection? <br />The proposed Project includes intersection improvements and no increase in demand for fire protection services <br />would occur with implementation of the proposed Project. Furthermore, the proposed Project would result in <br />positive impacts as a result of greater congestion relief and increased mobility in the vicinity for motor vehicles <br />including emergency vehicles. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Draft I November 2017 3-23 Environmental Consequences <br />75A-52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.