My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
20A - AA AGMT COST SAVINGS PWA
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
02/20/2018
>
20A - AA AGMT COST SAVINGS PWA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2018 5:57:10 PM
Creation date
2/15/2018 5:51:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
20A
Date
2/20/2018
Destruction Year
2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana RFP 17-072 1 Statement of Qualifications (Revised 11/9/17) • II • r , <br />Design <br />Coming out of the Roadmap, the Agency will have sufficient information to determine the next steps of <br />the project. In this capacity, the evaluation and decisions will be focused in two key areas; First, to <br />determine the need to procure a new software system supporting the streamlining of procedures. Second, <br />to confirm the in -scope services the Agency wants to move forward with transforming. <br />Software System selection <br />If it Is determined that a new software is necessary to facilitate streamlined process Improvements, <br />provide the ability to have data readily available for budgeting and reporting purposes, and be interfaced <br />with the City's Enterprise Management System., we will help write the RFP, determine the content to be <br />Included In the RFP documents and recommend what solution vendors that should be included in the <br />RFP process. <br />We will work with the Agency to determine the key criteria for assessing the systems through the analysis <br />of the required functionality, cost, ongoing support, viability of the vendor long term, IT Infrastructure, <br />ease of use, training methodology, and the service level agreement terms. <br />We have, as both practitioners and as consultants, assessed the need for, evaluated and Implemented <br />many different software systems and technology platforms. Our experience will help ensure that the <br />Agency selects a system that effectively and efficiently meets its requirements for streamlining data <br />collection, reporting and budgeting processes and procedures. <br />Design Procedures <br />The other key activity of this phase is the design of the new operating model and organizational structure <br />to deliver the optimal future state. The key outcome of the design is ensuring that proposed model is <br />practical, relevant, appropriate and achievable for the Agency and best supports its operational and <br />staffing goals while properly incorporating the technology solution(s) and enablers. <br />One of the key activities for achieving this is to facilitate workshops and small group work to design the <br />standardized, cross Agency To -Be processes at the sub -process and activity (desktop procedure) levels. <br />We will identify, confirm and prioritize the key process transformation opportunities with the internal <br />project team and key stakeholders. These activities will confirm end-to-end process ownership, <br />responsibilities by role and location, while documenting both the client and provider accountabilities. The <br />key output is the documentation of process maps and desktop procedures, validated and signed -off by <br />the internal team and subject matter experts. <br />PHASE 2 <br />After Phase 1, the key opportunities for streamlining and standardizing processes will be identified and <br />prioritized. This phase will begin by confirming that all functions are appropriately developed and fully <br />integrated into the end -state organization and conclude with the operationalization of the new model. <br />This includes ensuring that all processes have been clearly documented to identify who has <br />responsibility, all systems and technology are appropriately incorporated, and the work requirements <br />have been optimized. Through the work in this phase, we will assess the effectiveness of the operational <br />state and make changes to address any weaknesses identified. <br />Figure 6 shows the full schedule of activities and deliverables we will complete in Phase 2 <br />Chazey Partners Revised per email communication request 10/31/17 <br />20A-47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.